User talk:Don-vip/Archive 10
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
File:Casa de la Vall - Sculpture 1993.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:US 2016-1201 (27835247974).jpg
Copyright status: File:US 2016-1201 (27835247974).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:US 2016-1201 (27835247974).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:-NationalParksContestCAN Jovan Padia (28958858840).jpg
Copyright status: File:-NationalParksContestCAN Jovan Padia (28958858840).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:-NationalParksContestCAN Jovan Padia (28958858840).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:2016 09 28 Election Speakers on Campus (29357578084).jpg
Copyright status: File:2016 09 28 Election Speakers on Campus (29357578084).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:2016 09 28 Election Speakers on Campus (29357578084).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
File:U S Embassy Nairobi (4556727099).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 16:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Palmas CBERS4 PAN falsacor.pdf
Copyright status: File:Palmas CBERS4 PAN falsacor.pdf
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Palmas CBERS4 PAN falsacor.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Null edit after SDC edit
Thanks for adding SDC to your new uploads! Adding SDC like in this edit unfortunately doesn't trigger page invalidation (and update) so files will still be in tracker categories for SDC data missing. Bug somewhere in Phabricator. After adding SDC, can you do a null edit in your bot ("touch" the page) to trigger an update? Thank you, Multichill (talk) 13:47, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Multichill! Thank you:) I'm not sure how to do it? I'm using Wikidata-Toolkit here. Also I don't understand why a null edit will trigger page invalidation if a normal edit doesn't? vip (talk) 15:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Editing structured data is not considered a normal edit when it comes to invalidation. Just edit the page text without changing it and that will trigger an update (just like you can do as a normal user). Multichill (talk) 15:35, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ah ok, got it! Coding it right now. vip (talk) 15:37, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! That should keep the tracker categories cleaner. Multichill (talk) 21:07, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Multichill the "null edit" I do with "action=edit&format=json&bot=true&title=File:xxx&appendtext=" sometimes blanks the page, for example here. Do you know how to avoid that? vip (talk) 11:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Just do it like a normal user. Get the text and save it with the same text.
- I use https://doc.wikimedia.org/pywikibot/stable/api_ref/pywikibot.page.html#page.BasePage.touch Multichill (talk) 17:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Multichill the "null edit" I do with "action=edit&format=json&bot=true&title=File:xxx&appendtext=" sometimes blanks the page, for example here. Do you know how to avoid that? vip (talk) 11:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! That should keep the tracker categories cleaner. Multichill (talk) 21:07, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ah ok, got it! Coding it right now. vip (talk) 15:37, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Editing structured data is not considered a normal edit when it comes to invalidation. Just edit the page text without changing it and that will trigger an update (just like you can do as a normal user). Multichill (talk) 15:35, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51736432530).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51735546681).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51735778578).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51735778698).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51734719742).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51734719462).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51734719572).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51735546636).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51736432445).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51735547056).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51734720127).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51735779163).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51736189259).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51735778843).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51736189654).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51736432670).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51736189689).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51735779613).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51734719617).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51736189479).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51736189289).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51736432190).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51734719947).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51735779323).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51734719667).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51734719327).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51735779493).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51735779298).png
- File:Concurso de Fotografia -EuEscolhoATerra (51734720097).png
Yours sincerely, Queen of Hearts (talk) 01:28, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Museum curator remembers Air Force role in Canadian tragedy (4947186).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Consigned (talk) 17:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Exercise Amalgam Dart 21-2 210323-O-D0430-1001-C.jpg
- File:Exercise Amalgam Dart 21-2 210323-O-D0430-1005-C.jpg
- File:Exercise Amalgam Dart 21-2 210323-O-D0430-1011-C.jpg
- File:Exercise Amalgam Dart 21-2 210323-O-D0430-1007-C.jpg
- File:Exercise Amalgam Dart 21-2 210323-O-D0430-1003-C.jpg
- File:Exercise Amalgam Dart 21-2 210323-O-D0430-1010-C.jpg
- File:Exercise Amalgam Dart 21-2 210323-O-D0430-1012-C.jpg
- File:Exercise Amalgam Dart 21-2 210323-O-D0430-1008-C.jpg
- File:Exercise Amalgam Dart 21-2 210323-O-D0430-1004-C.jpg
- File:Exercise Amalgam Dart 21-2 210323-O-D0430-1013-C.jpg
- File:Exercise Amalgam Dart 21-2 210323-O-D0430-1002-C.jpg
Yours sincerely, Consigned (talk) 18:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Australian-American Fulbright Commission & IVLP Reception April 2019 (40787497743).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Abzeronow (talk) 21:17, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Australian-American Fulbright Commission & IVLP Reception April 2019 (46837476495).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Abzeronow (talk) 21:03, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Have It All Premiere (41396627175).jpg
Copyright status: File:Have It All Premiere (41396627175).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Have It All Premiere (41396627175).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:05, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Simulation of the MMX Rover landing.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Artem.G (talk) 18:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Dismounted Operations with O Troop (8284803).jpg
Copyright status: File:Dismounted Operations with O Troop (8284803).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Dismounted Operations with O Troop (8284803).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
dvidshub.net
I see you have it listed at your user page. Did you ever consider uploading them? We have over 500.00 files, but https://www.dvidshub.net/search/beta returns nearly 5 million files. Multichill (talk) 15:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! I already upload a lot of files from DVIDS (around 15k here) but as I review everything I upload, I don't plan to upload the entire database, at least not in short term. Right now I focus on space-related images (so mainly the Space Force, and a few pictures from Air Force), and also the DVIDS files taken in France. One problem with DVIDS is that in the 5 millions files, I find that many event-related files do not really belong to Commons scope as they feel more propaganda than informational pictures. Right now, to narrow the scope for Space Force, I maintain an ignore list of keywords that denote topics not space-related. If the community agrees that an entire upload of DVIDS makes sense for Commons, I could however technically do it (without reviewing the pictures however). vip (talk) 15:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Can you add VIRIN (P12967) to your new uploads?
- I guess it all boils down to signal to noise. We had similar discussions back in 2009 when I mass uploaded FEMA and US Navy photo's. In the end many more files were uploaded. Even with the propaganda I think it's still a good enough signal. Maybe just start small with pictures uploaded in the last month and see how that works out? Multichill (talk) 17:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- VIRIN property added: https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/toolforge-repos/spacemedia/-/commit/6ec188d674659e693e1eabd90fd9efebaf458b7a
- OK I'll give it a try, I'll let you know. vip (talk) 20:04, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @Multichill! I have started to extend the scope of my DVIDS imports from "U.S. in France" to "U.S. in Europe", which adds a lot more pictures with the important presence of U.S. troops in Germany. Meanwhile I have also proposed a new property on Wikidata, can you please go there and vote? :) Cheers. vip (talk) 10:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Slowly expanding scope is always a good strategy.
- I +1'd the new property. I wonder if we should also create a DVIDS image ID property while we're at it? Looks like url's like https://www.dvidshub.net/image/8694186/ just expands with the slug. Multichill (talk) 16:20, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Mmmm for the DVIDS image ID I wonder if it will be stable in the long term, as I see that they are building a new search tool, I hope they won't reimplement their backend with a new ID scheme. But yeah I think it's a good idea as well. vip (talk) 19:18, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- It appears that bot mixes up files from dvidshub.net and sends files intended for Category:Milimedia files (review needed) to Category:Spacemedia files (review needed).
- There're currently (about) 83 files in Spacemedia files (review needed) that are from dvidshub, but has nothing to do with Space Force, being instead from another parts of
imperialist war machineUS armed forces. See for example File:2nd Cavalry Regiment Quickstrike TOW Live Fire (8307646).jpg. Search filter isn't working, is it? Trasheater Midir (talk) 16:06, 23 October 2024 (UTC)- It is working. There a few false positives, but 83 files on about 10.000 is an acceptable ratio to me. The selection mechanism is pretty simple, based on the presence of a few keywords: "space", "rocket", "satellite", "launch", "nasa", "astronaut", "cosmonaut". vip (talk) 16:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- I've started to make it a little bit smarter. vip (talk) 17:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- It is working. There a few false positives, but 83 files on about 10.000 is an acceptable ratio to me. The selection mechanism is pretty simple, based on the presence of a few keywords: "space", "rocket", "satellite", "launch", "nasa", "astronaut", "cosmonaut". vip (talk) 16:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Mmmm for the DVIDS image ID I wonder if it will be stable in the long term, as I see that they are building a new search tool, I hope they won't reimplement their backend with a new ID scheme. But yeah I think it's a good idea as well. vip (talk) 19:18, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @Multichill! I have started to extend the scope of my DVIDS imports from "U.S. in France" to "U.S. in Europe", which adds a lot more pictures with the important presence of U.S. troops in Germany. Meanwhile I have also proposed a new property on Wikidata, can you please go there and vote? :) Cheers. vip (talk) 10:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)